This form is designed to provide feedback to authors of academic and academic support program institutional effectiveness reports.
Please evaluate each of the IE Reports for 2003-2004 that you have received.1) Select the Program you are evaluating Art EducationArtBiologyBusinessChemistryEarly Childhood EducationMaster's Art in Teaching LDElementary EducationEnglish CompositionHistoryInstructional AccommodationLibraryMass CommunicationMaster's of Science in PsychologyMathematicsM.Ed. Learning DisabilityPhysicsPolitical SciencePsychologySociologySpeechStudent AffairsTeaching Materials CenterTheaterWriting Center2) Rate each report on the following dimensions: Very Strong Strong Neutral Weak Very Weak Assessment Methods Assessment Methods Very StrongAssessment Methods StrongAssessment Methods NeutralAssessment Methods WeakAssessment Methods Very WeakStatement of Mission/Goals Statement of Mission/Goals Very StrongStatement of Mission/Goals StrongStatement of Mission/Goals NeutralStatement of Mission/Goals WeakStatement of Mission/Goals Very WeakResults/Evaluation Results/Evaluation Very StrongResults/Evaluation StrongResults/Evaluation NeutralResults/Evaluation WeakResults/Evaluation Very WeakPlanned Improvements Planned Improvements Very StrongPlanned Improvements StrongPlanned Improvements NeutralPlanned Improvements WeakPlanned Improvements Very WeakImprovements in Place Improvements in Place Very StrongImprovements in Place StrongImprovements in Place NeutralImprovements in Place WeakImprovements in Place Very WeakOverall Quality of Report Overall Quality of Report Very StrongOverall Quality of Report StrongOverall Quality of Report NeutralOverall Quality of Report WeakOverall Quality of Report Very Weak3) This IE Report is appropriate for evaluation by a visiting accreditation team.Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 4) What are the major strengths of the report?5) What the major weaknesses of the report?6) Suggestions to improve report:
